In the dynamic and highly competitive music industry, emerging artists face significant barriers to gaining visibility and building a sustainable career. One of the most sought-after opportunities for these artists is securing a slot as an opening act for a larger, more established artist on a major tour. This exposure provides access to broader audiences, enhances credibility, and can boost streaming metrics, which are critical indicators of success in the digital age. However, as Jeff Apruzzese’s comprehensive study in the Journal of the Music and Entertainment Industry Educators Association (2024) demonstrates, the impact of opening for larger acts is complex, offering both transformative opportunities and substantial challenges. This article explores the multifaceted dynamics of opening performances, delving into their potential lucrativeness, the intricate processes involved in becoming an opener, and the strategic considerations artists must navigate to maximize these opportunities. By drawing extensively on Apruzzese’s quantitative analysis, consumer and artist surveys, and theoretical frameworks, this article provides a granular examination of how opening acts influence emerging artists’ careers.
The Opportunities of Opening for Larger Acts
Enhanced Visibility and Streaming Boosts
Opening for a high-profile artist can significantly elevate an emerging artist’s visibility, often resulting in measurable increases in streaming metrics. Apruzzese’s study, which analyzed 57 opening artists associated with the top 10 tours of 2022 and 2023 (sourced from Pollstar), found that developing artists experienced an approximate 18% increase in Spotify monthly listenership leading up to and during tours. This surge is driven by the concept of “borrowed legitimacy,” as articulated by Spence’s (1974) market signaling theory, where affiliations with high-status partners enhance the perceived quality and credibility of lesser-known acts. The association with a headliner acts as an implicit endorsement, signaling to audiences and industry stakeholders that the opener is worthy of attention.
The study’s macro-level analysis revealed distinct patterns across artist career stages, as defined by Chartmetric’s ranking system (developing, mid-level, mainstream, superstar, legendary). In 2022, developing artists saw the most significant streaming increases (18%), followed by a 6% post-tour decline. Mainstream artists experienced smaller fluctuations, while superstar artists not only maintained but increased their streaming numbers post-tour, highlighting the benefits of sustained visibility at higher career stages. In 2023, mid-level artists, absent from the 2022 sample, showed a modest pre-tour increase but a remarkable 28% post-tour surge, suggesting that opening slots can have long-term benefits for artists at this stage.
Genre analysis further illuminated these trends. Pop/rock, country, and hip-hop genres exhibited the most substantial streaming increases in 2022, with pop/rock showing the largest post-tour decline. In 2023, the Latin genre emerged as a significant gainer, with notable increases both before and after performances. These findings reflect the historical dominance of pop/rock, country, and hip-hop in live music tours, as evidenced by Apruzzese’s analysis of 2,100 artists from Pollstar’s top 100 tours from 2002 to 2023, where these genres consistently prevailed. However, the rise of Latin music in 2023 underscores evolving audience preferences and the potential for genre-specific impacts.
The “Taylor Swift effect” provides a compelling case study of this phenomenon. Swift’s 2023 Eras Tour, analyzed at a micro-level, showcased how a headliner’s fanbase can amplify the profiles of opening acts. Artists like Phoebe Bridgers and Gracie Abrams benefited significantly due to their stylistic alignment with Swift’s pop and folk-oriented sound. Bridgers, whose indie rock and folk style resonated with Swift’s Folklore and Evermore audiences, saw a 6% streaming increase during the tour with only a 5% drop-off afterward. Abrams, with her indie pop and introspective ballads, experienced a small initial decline but sustained growth post-tour. In contrast, Owenn, an R&B and dance-focused artist, saw a dramatic 188% streaming increase during the tour but a 75% decline afterward, likely due to stylistic dissonance with Swift’s predominantly pop audience. These examples highlight how genre compatibility and audience alignment can significantly influence the effectiveness of opening slots.
Audience Discovery and Fanbase Growth
Live performances remain a critical platform for music discovery, bridging the gap between digital and physical engagement. Apruzzese’s consumer survey (N=525), conducted via Music Connect, provided detailed insights into concertgoers’ behaviors. The sample, comprising 51.8% males, 46.9% females, 1.0% non-binary individuals, and 0.4% undisclosed, with 45.7% aged 18–34, 44.6% aged 35–54, and 9.7% aged 55+, revealed that 89% of respondents attended at least one concert annually, and 74% spent $50 or more on tickets. Pop, rock, and country were the predominant genres, favored by 90% of respondents.
A key finding was that 81% of respondents were somewhat or extremely likely to arrive early to see opening acts, yet only 39% considered the identity of openers when purchasing tickets. This suggests that while headliners drive ticket sales, the concert experience itself facilitates discovery. Notably, 68% of respondents reported discovering new bands through opening acts, and 50% later purchased tickets to see these acts headline. Furthermore, 69% were likely to explore new music if endorsed by a favored artist, 73% sought information about openers post-ticket purchase, and 67% streamed their music. These statistics underscore “‘’the potential for opening slots to convert casual listeners into dedicated fans, particularly when the headliner’s fanbase is engaged and receptive.
The survey also highlighted the role of endorsement in driving engagement. The 69% likelihood of exploring endorsed artists aligns with network theory (Podolny, 2001), which posits that fans of a headliner are more likely to engage with an opener due to the social and cultural capital embedded in the association. This effect is amplified when the headliner actively promotes the opener, as seen in historical examples like Justin Bieber, Ed Sheeran, and Shawn Mendes, who leveraged Swift’s tours to catapult their careers.
Social Capital and Industry Credibility
Opening for a larger act provides significant social capital, as described by Bourdieu (1986) and Coleman (1988). The affiliation with a high-status headliner serves as an endorsement, elevating the opener’s profile within the industry. This “borrowed legitimacy” can lead to further opportunities, such as festival bookings, collaborations, or record deals. For example, MUNA, a mainstream synth-pop and indie act, sustained interest post-Swift tour through appearances with boygenius and new music releases, demonstrating how concurrent activities can amplify the benefits of opening slots.
In niche music markets, such as independent or alternative scenes, curated festival lineups play a similar role. Bennett et al. (2014) note that festivals act as gatekeepers, with smaller acts gaining legitimacy through association with high-status headliners. However, challenges like radius clauses, which restrict artists from performing in nearby locations, can limit smaller artists’ opportunities, unlike their more established counterparts who can negotiate favorable terms (Apruzzese, 2020). These dynamics underscore the broader role of strategic affiliations in building industry credibility.
The Challenges of Opening for Larger Acts
Financial Precariousness
Despite the visibility benefits, opening for larger acts is often financially challenging. Apruzzese’s artist survey (N=47), conducted via snowball sampling, found that 40% of artists reported financial losses from opening slots, primarily due to costs for travel, accommodation, and marketing. Independent artists, in particular, may tour at a loss, hoping that exposure will yield long-term gains (Marshall, 2013). Only 50% reported no financial loss, and 10% were uncertain of the impact, highlighting the precarious economic model for emerging acts.
The financial strain was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted the live music sector and forced many artists to rely on livestream performances. However, these virtual events often failed to match the exposure and engagement of in-person shows (Apruzzese et al., 2020). The minimal compensation for opening acts, coupled with the inability to negotiate terms like radius clauses, further hinders financial viability. For example, smaller artists may be bound by contracts that limit their performance opportunities, while larger artists can secure exemptions.
Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Engagement
While opening slots often lead to immediate streaming spikes, sustaining this engagement is a significant challenge. Apruzzese’s study noted that developing artists faced significant post-tour drop-offs, with streaming numbers declining by 6% in 2022 and more in some cases. The micro-level analysis of Swift’s Eras Tour provided granular insights into this trend. Owenn’s 75% post-tour decline, despite a 188% increase during the tour, illustrates the precarious nature of gains when genre misalignment occurs. Similarly, developing artists in the broader sample saw pronounced increases but the largest drop-offs, while superstar artists like Paramore showed minimal changes, suggesting a plateau effect at higher fame levels.
This aligns with the “attention economy” framework (Hesmondhalgh, 2018), which highlights the difficulty of maintaining attention in a fragmented marketplace. The “paradox of choice” (Schwartz, 2009) further complicates this, as consumers, overwhelmed by options, may revert to familiar artists post-tour. While algorithms on platforms like Spotify’s Discover Weekly can boost short-term exposure, their impact on long-term fan retention remains uncertain (Datta et al., 2018). Social media can help sustain engagement, but its effectiveness is genre-dependent and variable (Hesmondhalgh, 2018).
Genre and Audience Mismatch
The success of an opening act heavily depends on genre compatibility and audience alignment. Mismatches can lead to minimal or negative outcomes, as seen with Paramore, which experienced a 1% streaming decrease during Swift’s tour and no change afterward. Network theory suggests that the social and cultural capital of the headliner may not transfer effectively if the opener’s style does not resonate with the audience. For example, Owenn’s R&B and dance focus clashed with Swift’s pop audience, leading to a significant post-tour drop-off.
Historical context, as provided by promoter Bill Graham, suggests that eclectic lineups can succeed if the headliner’s fanbase trusts their curatorial choices (Graham and Greenfield, 1992). Graham’s philosophy emphasized the audience’s relationship with the headliner over strict genre alignment, as seen in his diverse concert pairings. However, in today’s data-driven industry, genre compatibility appears more critical, particularly for emerging artists reliant on immediate audience connection.
Selection Variability and Opportunity Costs
The process of securing an opening slot is complex and variable, introducing opportunity costs. Apruzzese’s artist survey revealed that 29% of artists were selected through booking agents, 21% via promoter recommendations, and many through personal connections. Notably, none were chosen through contests or buy-on methods in this sample, though such practices are prevalent. The reliance on subjective criteria and industry relationships can limit access for artists without established networks, and the time and resources invested in securing these slots may detract from other career-building activities, such as recording or independent touring.
The study’s limitations highlight additional complexities. Extraneous factors, such as viral social media activity, festival performances, or new music releases, can influence streaming metrics, making it challenging to isolate the impact of opening slots. The reliance on AllMusic’s genre categorization, which combines pop and rock, may obscure subgenre-specific trends, further complicating analysis.
The Process of Becoming an Opening Act
Pathways to Selection
Securing an opening slot involves navigating a multifaceted selection process, which varies depending on the tour, headliner, and industry dynamics. Apruzzese’s artist survey provided detailed insights into these pathways:
- Personal Connections: Friendships or professional relationships with the headlining band or their team were crucial for many artists. These connections often stem from shared tours, mutual acquaintances, or local music scenes, reflecting the importance of networking.
- Booking Agents and Promoters: Booking agents (29%) and concert promoters (21%) play a pivotal role in recommending openers. Agents leverage their industry relationships to pitch clients to tour managers, while promoters may suggest local or emerging acts to complement the headliner’s appeal. For example, a promoter might recommend a regional act to boost local ticket sales.
- Management Recommendations: Though less common (under 10%), artist managers can advocate for their clients, particularly if they have connections with the headliner’s management team. This pathway is more accessible to artists with professional representation.
- Buy-On Opening Acts: In some cases, artists or their labels pay to secure an opening slot, a practice known as “buying onto” a tour. This involves covering production costs (e.g., lighting, sound, crew) or guaranteeing a financial contribution to the tour. While not represented in Apruzzese’s sample, buy-ons are prevalent in competitive markets, particularly for high-profile tours like those of Taylor Swift or Bad Bunny. This approach is financially risky and typically reserved for artists with significant backing from labels or investors.
- Contests and Open Calls: Though rare in the study’s findings, some tours or festivals hold contests or open submissions for opening slots. These are less common for major tours but may occur for smaller venues, regional events, or festival undercards. For example, a festival might host a battle-of-the-bands competition to select an opener.
Paid vs. Buy-On Opening Acts
- Paid Opening Acts: In a paid opening act scenario, the artist is compensated for their performance, though the payment is often minimal. Compensation may include a flat fee (e.g., $500-$2,000 per show), a percentage of ticket sales, or coverage of specific expenses (e.g., travel or accommodation). Paid slots are more common for mid-level or mainstream artists with some industry leverage, such as MUNA or Gracie Abrams. However, as Apruzzese’s survey noted, 40% of artists faced financial losses, suggesting that payments rarely cover full costs for emerging acts. For example, travel costs for a multi-city tour can exceed $10,000, far outstripping typical opening act fees.
- Buy-On Opening Acts: Buy-on slots require the artist or their team to invest financially in the tour, either by paying a fee (e.g., $5,000-$50,000) or covering production costs. This approach is a calculated risk, banking on the exposure to offset the upfront investment. Buy-ons are more common for developing artists or those signed to labels willing to subsidize the opportunity. For instance, a label might cover a $20,000 buy-on fee for a 10-date tour, expecting the artist’s streaming numbers and fanbase to grow. The financial burden can be substantial, and the lack of guaranteed long-term gains makes this a high-stakes strategy. Apruzzese’s study did not include buy-on cases, but industry reports suggest they are common for tours with significant audience reach.
Steps to Secure an Opening Slot
- Build a Strong Portfolio: Artists should have a professional press kit, including high-quality recordings, live performance footage, and a clear brand identity. A robust social media presence (e.g., 10,000+ Instagram followers) and streaming metrics (e.g., 50,000+ Spotify monthly listeners) can attract attention from promoters and agents.
- Network Strategically: Attend industry events like SXSW or NAMM, connect with booking agents, and build relationships with other artists and promoters. Personal connections often open doors to opening slots, as seen in the 29% of survey respondents selected through friendships.
- Work with a Booking Agent: A reputable agent can pitch the artist to tour managers and promoters, increasing the likelihood of securing a slot. Agents typically take a 10–15% commission but provide valuable industry access. For example, an agent might pitch a developing artist to open for a mid-level act like The 1975.
- Leverage Management: If the artist has a manager, they can advocate for opening opportunities, particularly if they have ties to the headliner’s team. Managers may coordinate with tour promoters to secure slots on tours like Dua Lipa’s 2022 tour, which featured openers like Megan Thee Stallion.
- Consider Buy-On Opportunities (Cautiously): For artists with financial backing, buy-on slots may be an option, but they require careful evaluation of the tour’s audience, genre fit, and potential return on investment. For example, a $30,000 buy-on for a 15-date tour might be justified if the headliner’s audience aligns closely with the opener’s style.
- Engage with Fans and Platforms: Post-tour engagement is critical. Artists should promote their involvement in the tour on social media (e.g., Instagram Reels, TikTok videos) and leverage streaming platforms like Spotify’s Discover Weekly to sustain visibility. Apruzzese’s study noted that 63% of artists observed increased social media activity post-tour, emphasizing the importance of digital engagement.
Strategic Considerations for Maximizing Opening Slots
To maximize the benefits of opening for larger acts, artists must adopt a strategic approach, informed by Apruzzese’s findings and industry dynamics:
- Genre and Audience Alignment: Choose tours with headliners whose audience aligns with the artist’s style. Phoebe Bridgers’ success on Swift’s tour highlights the importance of stylistic compatibility, as her indie rock and folk style resonated with Swift’s fans. In contrast, Owenn’s R&B focus led to a significant post-tour drop-off.
- Post-Tour Engagement: Artists should maintain visibility through social media, new releases, or additional performances. MUNA’s sustained interest post-Swift tour was bolstered by their boygenius appearances and new music, illustrating the value of concurrent activities. Apruzzese’s study noted that artists leveraging platforms like Instagram and TikTok post-tour were better positioned to capitalize on exposure (Baym, 2013).
- Financial Planning: Budget carefully to minimize losses. Seek sponsorships, crowdfunding, or label support to offset costs, and negotiate terms where possible to cover essentials like travel. For example, an artist might secure a $5,000 sponsor to cover tour expenses, reducing financial strain.
- Leverage the Headliner’s Fanbase: Engage with the headliner’s audience during the tour through meet-and-greets, merchandise sales, or social media shoutouts. The consumer survey showed that 73% of attendees seek information about openers post-ticket purchase, creating an opportunity for connection. For instance, an artist might offer signed merchandise to encourage fan interaction.
- Diversify Exposure: Combine opening slots with other visibility strategies, such as festival appearances, viral social media campaigns, or features in publications like Rolling Stone. Apruzzese’s limitations section noted that concurrent activities (e.g., festival performances) can influence streaming metrics, suggesting a multi-pronged approach.
- Monitor Streaming Metrics: Use tools like Chartmetric to track Spotify monthly listenership before, during, and after the tour. Apruzzese’s methodology, which measured listenership four weeks pre- and post-tour, provides a model for assessing impact. Artists can adjust their promotional strategies based on these insights.
Future Research and Limitations
Apruzzese’s study acknowledges several limitations that inform future research. The reliance on AllMusic’s combined pop/rock genre tag obscures subgenre-specific trends, such as distinctions between indie rock and mainstream pop. A more granular genre classification could reveal nuanced impacts. Additionally, the study’s sample size (57 artists, 525 consumers, 47 artists) limits representativeness, and self-reported survey data introduces potential response bias. Extraneous factors, such as viral social media posts or new releases, complicate attribution of streaming changes to opening slots.
Future research could adopt a longitudinal approach, tracking nascent artists over several years to assess long-term impacts. Qualitative interviews with artists, managers, and promoters could provide deeper insights into selection processes and subjective experiences. A systematic analysis of Pollstar’s top 100 tours annually could identify evolving trends, while a larger, more diverse sample would enhance generalizability. These directions would build on Apruzzese’s foundational work, addressing gaps in understanding the opening act phenomenon.
Conclusion
Opening for larger acts offers emerging artists a powerful platform to boost visibility, gain credibility, and connect with new audiences. The immediate benefits — streaming spikes of up to 18% for developing artists, 68% audience discovery rates, and enhanced social capital — are significant, particularly for those at early career stages. However, the financial challenges, with 40% of artists reporting losses, the short-term nature of gains, and the dependence on genre compatibility and audience alignment underscore the limitations of this strategy. Securing an opening slot requires navigating a complex selection process, from leveraging personal connections and booking agents to considering high-risk buy-on opportunities. By aligning with the right headliner, engaging actively with audiences, planning financially, and diversifying exposure, artists can maximize the impact of opening slots. As Apruzzese’s study concludes, opening acts are a valuable but not transformative step in an artist’s career, requiring integration into a broader strategic framework to achieve lasting success in the competitive music industry. The interplay of market signaling, consumer behavior, and network effects, as illuminated by this research, provides a roadmap for emerging artists navigating the live music landscape.
Thanks for reading!
Skaggs







